MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145416541 · doi:10.1177/1947601911408082

Regulation and Function of the RasGRP Family of Ras Activators in Blood Cells

2011· article· en· W2145416541 on OpenAlexaff
J. C. Stone

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes & Cancer · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuanine nucleotide exchange factorGTPaseCell biologyDiacylglycerol kinasePAK1BiologyPhosphorylationProtein kinase CChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ras guanyl nucleotide releasing proteins (RasGRPs) are guanyl nucleotide exchange factors that activate Ras and related GTPases such as Rap. Like Sos proteins, RasGRPs have a catalytic region composed of a Ras exchange motif (REM) and a CDC25 domain. RasGRPs also possess a pair of atypical EF hands that may bind calcium in vivo and a C1 domain resembling the diacylglycerol (DAG)-binding domain of protein kinase C. DAG directly activates RasGRPs by a membrane recruitment mechanism as well as indirectly by PKC-mediated phosphorylation. RasGRPs are prominently expressed in blood cells. RasGRP1 acts downstream of TCR, while RasGRP1 and RasGRP3 both act downstream of BCR. Together, they regulate Ras in adaptive immune cells. RasGRP2, through Rap, plays a role in controlling platelet adhesion, while RasGRP4 controls Ras activation in mast cells. RasGRP malfunction likely contributes to autoimmunity and may contribute to blood malignancies. RasGRPs might prove to be viable drug targets. The intracellular site of RasGRP action and the relationship between RasGRPs and other Ras regulatory mechanisms are subjects of lively debate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenes & CancerSame topicProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingFrench-language works237,207