Differential Expression of Steroidogenic Factor-1 and FTF/LRH-1 in the Rodent Ovary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1) (NR5A1) is an orphan nuclear receptor that plays a premier role in ovarian organogenesis. Recent studies document mRNA expression of the structurally related factor NR5A2 (FTF, LRH-1, SF-2) in the adult ovary and more specifically in granulosa cells and luteal cells but not theca cells. Conversely, SF-1 was shown to be expressed at higher levels in theca/interstitial cells. These latter observations raised the possibility that FTF/LRH-1 may control target gene expression in granulosa cells of developing follicles. Using quantitative PCR our results show that FTF/LRH-1 message is expressed at higher levels in the ovary than in liver or other tissues analyzed. We show by in situ hybridization and LacZ expression in ovaries of transgenic mice bearing an FTF-promoter-LacZ fusion gene that FTF/LRH-1 is selectively expressed in granulosa cells of rat and mouse ovaries and is not present in theca cells or interstitial cells. However, by a variety of approaches, we showed that SF-1 mRNA and protein are expressed in greater amounts than FTF/LRH-1 in granulosa cells of follicles at all stages of development. Expression of SF-1 mRNA and protein in granulosa cells was verified by in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry of ovarian sections, and immunocytochemistry of cultured rat granulosa cells. The significance of SF-1 in regulating target gene activation was supported by EMSA. An abundant granulosa cell protein binding to the SF-1-binding motif (CCAAGGTCA) present in the aromatase promoter and an FTF/LRH-1 motif (TGTCCTTGAACA) in the alpha-fetoprotein promoter was supershifted by two SF-1-specific antibodies but not by an FTF antibody. Conversely, with the same probes, a less abundant protein/DNA complex present in liver and ovarian cell extracts was shifted by an FTF antibody but not by the SF-1 antibodies. SF-1 and FTF/LRH-1 were differentially regulated in vivo by estradiol, FSH and prolactin. Collectively these data indicate that granulosa cells of small and preovulatory follicles express both SF-1 and FTF/LRH-1 and that each orphan receptor may regulate target gene expression in these cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".