MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145443684

Iowa Virtual Literacy Protocol: A Pre-Experimental Design Using Kurzweil 3000 Text-to-Speech Software with Incarcerated Adult Learners.

2012· dissertation· en· W2145443684 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yvette Karen McCulley

Bibliographic record

VenueBIA (Drake University) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtocol (science)LiteracyComputer scienceSoftwareMultimediaData scienceMathematics educationPsychologyOperating systemPedagogyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem: The increasingly competitive global economy demands literate, educated workers.Both men and women experience the effects of education on employment rates and income.Racial and ethnic minorities, English language learners, and especially those with prison records are most deeply affected by the economic consequences of dropping out of school.The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of adaptive technology (text-to-speech software) on incarcerated low-literate adult populations.This study will determine the effectiveness of text-to-speech computer software technology with incarcerated adult learners seeking to improve literacy competencies.paying, dead-end jobs.Only 7% of dropouts 25 and older have ever made more than $40,000 a year (Johnson, 2011).In hard economic times, some will find that not having a diploma puts them at the front of the unemployment line.High school dropouts can expect to earn significantly less than high school graduates due to both income differences and employment rates.Over a lifetime, a high school dropout will earn $200,000 less than a high school graduate (Johnston, 2011).For more than 60 years, millions of adults who did not complete their formal high school studies have used the General Educational Development (GED) Tests to realize both personal satisfaction and educational and occupational opportunities.The GED Testing Program provides high-quality tests and accessible testing services for individuals who may benefit from high school diplomas or certificates, awarded by participating jurisdictions in the United States, Canada, and U.S. insular areas (American Council of Education, 2008). 1 However, obtaining a GED is no quick fix for low earnings: it takes time for substantial GED-related differences to accrue (Tyler, 2007).For example, for Black men obtaining GED certificates in prison, they do not realize immediate economic payoff until after five years (Tyler, 2007).A recent study in Florida linked GED Test information to quarterly earnings records collected by Florida's unemployment insurance system.The study included 81,170 individuals, all of whom were between the ages of 16 and 40 when they attempted the GED.Five years after achieving a GED, the GED holders' income showed a 15% gain (Tyler, Murname & Willett, 2000).But even when high school dropouts use the GED Tests to obtain basic credentials, they often decline to pursue further education, limiting their life chances in a 1 An example of an insular area is American Samoa.The Samoans have adopted their own constitution, are not American citizens, do not pay federal taxes, and control their own borders.Other examples of insular areas include Guam, U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBIA (Drake University)Same topicArtificial Intelligence in LawFrench-language works237,207