MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145454103 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2004.1378350

Group shared protection (GSP): a scalable solution for spare capacity reconfiguration in mesh WDM networks

2005· article· en· W2145454103 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl reconfigurationScalabilitySpare partComputer sciencePath protectionDistributed computingComputer networkJoinsHeuristicsWavelength-division multiplexingSurvivabilityPath (computing)Parallel computingEmbedded systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel framework of shared protection, namely group shared protection (GSP), in mesh wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) networks with dynamically arriving connection requests. Based on the (M:N)/sup n/ control architecture, GSP has n mutually independent protection groups, each of which contains N SRLG-disjoint working paths protected by M protection paths. Due to the SRLG-disjointedness of the working paths in each protection group, GSP not only allows the spare capacity to be totally sharable among the corresponding working paths, but also reduces the number of working paths affected due to a single link failure. Based on the framework, an integer linear program (ILP) formulation that can optimally reconfigure the spare capacity for a specific protection group whenever a working-protection path-pair joins is proposed. Two heuristics namely link-shared protection (LSP) and ring-shared protection (RSP) are introduced for further compromising the performance and the computational complexity. The proposed schemes are compared with a reported one, namely successive survivable routing (SSR). The experimental results show that LSP, RSP and SSR yield similar performance in terms of resource sharing, whereas ILP outperforms all of them by (6-16%). Due to the limited number of working paths in each protection group, ILP can handle a dynamically arriving connection request in a reasonable amount of time. Also, we find that the number of affected working paths in GSP is about half of that in SSR. We conclude that GSP provides a scalable and efficient solution for dynamic spare capacity reconfiguration following the (M:N)/sup n/ control architecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207