Relationship between right ventricular wave speed and elastance in dogs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wave speed (c) must be known to separate forward- and backward-going waves during wave-intensity analysis, which measures the energy transported by the waves in the circulation. c is related to elastance; the present study was performed to measure right ventricular (RV) c during the cardiac cycle and to compare c with RV elastance. In 7 dogs, we measured right atrial, pulmonary arterial, pericardial and 2 RV pressures, and pulmonary arterial flow. A pulse generator was connected to the RV apex, and c was measured by determining the transit time between the 2 high-fidelity RV pressure transducers; the distance was measured roentgenographically. Eight sonomicrometry crystals were implanted in the RV endocardium to calculate RV volume and, thereby, elastance. RV c ranged from approximately 1 m/s during diastole to approximately 4 m/s during systole. Log-log plots of c vs. elastance were linear. These slopes represent the power relationships between c and elastance and ranged from 0.30 to 0.56; for the combined data, it was 0.31. Given knowledge of c, forward- and backward-going waves can be identified and their energy quantitated. In the canine RV, c is approximately proportional to 1/3 the power of elastance: log c = 0.31.log E - 2.05.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".