MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145488889 · doi:10.1353/crv.0.0047

Death Wore Black Chiffon: Sex and Gender in CSI

2009· article· fr· W2145488889 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Carlen Lavigne

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of American Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGender studiesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In light of the popularity of television crime dramas, it seems prudent to investigate the political nature of their prime-time messaging. From a feminist perspective, an analysis of gender and sexuality issues in CSI: Crime Scene Investigation reveals that the program consistently associates women, queer cultures, and sexual subcultures with shallow stereotypes, negativity, and death. À la lumière de la popularité des dramatiques policières télé visées, il semble prudent d'examiner la nature politique de leurs messages aux heures de grande écoute. Du point de vue féministe, une analyse des questions de genre et de sexualité dans CSI : Crime Scene Investigation révèle que l'émission associe constamment les femmes, les cultures gaies et les sous-cultures sexuelles à des stéréotypes superficiels, à la négativité et à la mort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of American StudiesSame topicMedia Studies and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207