MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Metallurgical analysis of magnetic pulse welds of AZ31 magnesium alloy

2011· article· en· W2145498379 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience and Technology of Welding & Joining · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceWeldingMagnesium alloyComposite materialTransmission electron microscopyMetallurgyDeformation (meteorology)Fracture (geology)AlloyHeat-affected zone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnesium AZ31 sheets have been lap welded with magnetic pulse welding using H shaped symmetric coils connected to a Pulsar MPW-25 capacitor bank. The joints displayed an increasing trend in strength with discharge energy. The weld morphology consisted of twin bond zones separated by an unbonded centre zone. Metallographic examination of the unbonded centre zone revealed anisotropic deformation and a lack cleaning from the interface. This zone forms as a result of normal impact in the initial stage of collision. Transmission electron microscopy of the bond zone revealed a continuous interface having an 8–25 μm thick interlayer with dislocation cell structure and distinct boundaries with adjacent material. The interlayer may have formed in a semisolid state at elevated temperature. The interlayer corresponds to a ductile fracture surface and is responsible for the joint's high strength. Nanoscale grains were found beside the interlayer as well as larger, highly elongated grains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it