MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145530932 · doi:10.1063/1.1344560

Edge flow measurements with Gundestrup probes

2001· article· en· W2145530932 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Plasmas · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsStreamlines, streaklines, and pathlinesPlasmaMach numberTokamakMagnetic fieldTorusPlasma diagnosticsComputational physicsKinetic energyMagnetohydrodynamicsAtomic physicsMechanicsNuclear physicsClassical mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ion current collected by a probe in a magnetized plasma is sensitive to the angle between its surface and the flow streamlines. This intuitive concept is the basis of the Gundestrup probe, a polar array of planar collectors mounted around an insulating housing. Probe theory for measuring flows has been developed on two fronts: Recent kinetic and fluid models, reviewed here, give similar predictions for the collected current within the range of applicability of the model assumptions. A comparison with measurements by a rotating Mach probe in the CASTOR tokamak (Czech Academy of Sciences Torus) [J. Stöckel, J. Badalec, I. Ďuran et al., Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion, 41, 577 (1999)] highlights the role of magnetization in ion collection at grazing angles of incidence between the probe surface and the magnetic field lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it