MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145552404

Más que pacientes morales

2012· article· es· W2145552404 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDilemata · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Como bien sabemos, la identificacion de aquellos individuos capaces de experimentar emociones conscientes es clave para determinar que seres merecen ser considerados moralmente.1 Esto es defendible desde distintos enfoques normativos (vease Horta, 2009). Sin embargo, dado que no somos capaces de mesurar directamente que individuos son conscientes, dependemos de otro tipo de informacion, que podemos denominar indirecta, para evaluar la probabilidad de que un individuo sea capaz de darse cuenta en mayor o menor medida de aquello que le sucede. Este enfoque reduccionista, a pesar de ser la herramienta mas fiable que disponemos para esta tarea, deviene mas cuestionable cuando consideramos el caso de individuos incapaces de utilizar alguna de las formas de lenguaje humano (Sanchez Suarez, 2010). Este hecho es fundamental para comprender que desde el ambito cientifico aun existan posturas desde las que se argumenta Received: 07-05-2012 Accepted: 15-05-2012 ?Mas que pacientes morales?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it