MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145559695 · doi:10.5539/ijb.v3n2p135

Investigate the Effect of Nd-Yag Laser Beam on Soybean (Glycin max) Leaves at the Protein Level

2011· article· en· W2145559695 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Noha S. Khalifa, H. El Ghandoor

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMagnetic and Electromagnetic Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRuBisCOIrradiationLaserOxygenaseChemistryMass spectrometryProtein subunitNd:YAG laserMolecular massPyruvate carboxylaseFood scienceEnzymeHorticultureChromatographyBiologyBiochemistryGeneOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of pre-sowing laser treatment on soybean seeds was investigated, using neodymium-doped yttriumaluminium garnet (Nd-Yag) laser source at wave length lamda= 532nm. Soybean uniform seeds (Glycin max L. cv.Giza 111) were exposed to laser irradiation for 5, 10, 30, 60 and 120 minutes. The growth potential of 4 - weekoldseedlings was progressively enhanced with the increase in time durations of laser treatment. In this study,protein banding patterns of the leaf pools of the irradiated and non-irradiated control plants were investigated toelucidate the role of laser at the molecular level. These patterns showed proportional increased levels of a ~ 55KD protein in alliance with the pre - sowing exposure time to laser irradiation. This protein was gel eluted andidentified using de novo protein sequencing analysis of Liquid Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry andTandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/ MS/MS) technique. The database search of the results led to identification ofthis protein as the large subunit of the enzyme 1,5 ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/ oxygenase (RubisCO). Theconcomitantly enhanced growth potential of soybean seedlings with the elevation of the level of RubisCO willbe discussed from different points of views.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of BiologySame topicMagnetic and Electromagnetic EffectsFrench-language works237,207