MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145560911 · doi:10.1139/bcb-2015-0006

Structural and ultrastructural evaluation of the aortic wall after transplantation of bone marrow-derived cells (BMCs) in a model for atherosclerosis

2015· article· en· W2145560911 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alyne Souza Felix, Nemesis Monteiro, Vinícius Novaes Rocha, Genilza Pereira de Oliveira, Ana Lúcia Rosa Nascimento, Laı́s de Carvalho, Alessandra Alves Thole, Jorge José de Carvalho

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransplantationParacrine signallingBone marrowEndocrinologyMedicineInternal medicineAortaBone Marrow Stem CellAndrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stem cells are characterized by their ability to differentiate into multiple cell lineages and display the paracrine effect. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of therapy with bone marrow-derived cells (BMCs) on glucose, lipid metabolism, and aortic wall remodeling in mice through the administration of a high-fat diet and subsequent BMCs transplantation. C57BL/6 mice were fed a control diet (CO group) or an atherogenic diet (AT group). After 16 weeks, the AT group was divided into 4 subgroups: an AT 14 days group and AT 21 days group that were given an injection of vehicle and sacrificed after 14 and 21 days, respectively, and an AT-BMC 14 days group and AT-BMC 21 days group that were given an injection of BMCs and sacrificed after 14 and 21 days, respectively. The BMCs transplant had reduced blood glucose, triglycerides, and total cholesterol. There was no significant difference in relation to body mass between the transplanted groups and non-transplanted groups, and all were different than CO. There was no significant difference in the glycemic curve among AT 14 days, AT-BMC 14 days, and AT 21 days, and these were different than the CO and the AT-BMC 21 days groups. The increased thickness of the aortic wall was observed in all atherogenic groups, but was significantly smaller in group AT-BMC 21 days compared to AT 14 days and AT 21 days. Vacuoles in the media tunic, delamination and the thinning of the elastic lamellae were observed in AT 14 days and AT 21 days. The smallest number of these was displayed on the AT-BMC 14 days and AT-BMC 21 days. Marking to CD105, CD133, and CD68 were observed in AT 14 days and AT 21 days. These markings were not observed in AT-BMC 14 days or in AT-BMC 21 days. Electron micrographs show the beneficial remodeling in AT-BMC 14 days and AT-BMC 21 days, and the structural organization was similar to the CO group. Vesicles of pinocytosis, projection of smooth muscle cells, and delamination of the internal elastic lamina are seen in groups AT 14 days and AT 21 days. Endothelial cells were preserved, and regular and continuous contour in internal elastic lamelae were observed in the CO, the AT-BMC 14 days, and AT-BMC 21 days groups. In conclusion, in an atherosclerotic model using mice and atherogenic diet, the injection of BMCs improves glucose, lipid metabolism, and causes a beneficial remodeling of the aortic wall.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207