Journalistic Narrative Modes in Both Mainland and Taiwan since 1949/MODES NARRATIFS JOURNALISTIQUES SUR LE CONTINENT CHINOIS ET À TAIWAN DEPUIS 1949
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The evolution of journalistic style can be explored from multiple perspectives. The shifts of horizons between the narrator and addressee, the change of the communicative context and media, the similarities and differences of narrative modes, and the sequence of time structure can all constitute important research areas. The present essay is an investigation into the similarities and differences of journalistic styles between mainland China and Taiwan, with a view to proving that, apart from the subjectivity of the communicators, the change of communicative context is also a dynamic that brings about the accretion of alien elements in journalistic style as well as the formation of individuality. As journalism in the mainland of China has, since 1949, been developing in an isolated context, its style as a result is a combination of modernity, popularity and nationality. The journalistic style in Taiwan, on the other hand, has retained many of the characteristics of the journalistic style in the mainland in the late 1940s, evincing conspicuous family ties with the latter. With the continuous deepening of contact and exchange between the mainland and Taiwan since the former adopted the policy of reform and opening up in the 1980s, journalistic styles on the both sides have demonstrated more and more common features. The essay will, by way of examining the evolution of the journalistic style in both the mainland and Taiwan, seek out their respective narrative characteristics, which, under the influence of socio-cultural changes, have undergone a process of divergence and convergence. It is the author’s hope that this academic effort will shed new light on the history of journalistic writing. Key words: 1949, Main Land and Taiwan, journalistic narrative modes, socio-cultural context Resume: L’evolution du style journalistique peut etre exploree dans de diverses perspectives. Le changement d’horizon entre le narrateur et le destinataire, la mutation du contexte communicatif et de medias, les similitudes et differences des modes narratifs et l’ordre horaire constituent tous des domaines de recherche importants. L’article present procede a une investigation des similitudes et differences du style journalistique entre le continent chinois et Taiwan, dans le but de prouver que, a part la subjectivite de l’auteur, le changement du contexte communicatif est un facteur important qui introduit des elements etrangers dans le style journalistique et dans la formation de l’individualite. Comme le journalisme sur le continent chinois, a developpe, depuis 1949, dans un contexte isole, son style est par consequent la combinaison de la modernite, de la popularite et de la nationalite. Le style journalistique a Taiwan a garde beaucoup de caracteristiques du style du continent dans la derniere periode des annees 1940, manifestant des liens evidents avec celui-ci. Avec l’approfondissement continu du contact et de l’echange entre les deux cotes, depuis la reforme et l’ouverture vers l’exterieur du continent chinois dans les annees 1980, leurs styles journalistiques ont presente de plus en plus de points communs. L’article present, en examinant l’evolution du style journalistique sur le continent chinois et a Taiwan, recherche leurs caracteristiques narratives respectives, qui, sous l’influence des changements socio-culturels, ont connu un processus de divergence et convergence. L’auteur espere que son effort academique va eclairer l’histoire de la redaction journalistique. Mots-Cles: 1949, continent chinois et Taiwan, modes narratifs journalistiques, contexte socio-culturel
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".