MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145593641 · doi:10.1109/icccn.2007.4318008

Reducing Communication Overhead of Key Distribution Schemes for Wireless Sensor Networks

2007· article· en· W2145593641 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceKey (lock)Computer networkOverhead (engineering)Key distribution in wireless sensor networksWireless sensor networkKey distributionWirelessNode (physics)Key managementTransmission (telecommunications)Broadcasting (networking)Distributed computingWireless networkIdentifierPublic-key cryptographyComputer securityTelecommunicationsEngineeringEncryption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Establishing a secure communication link in a wireless sensor network is a challenging task due to resource limitation and wireless nature of transmission. A symmetric key distribution is a practical and efficient solution which has been studied extensively [4][5][6][7][9][11]. A secure communication link is established between sensors that hold common keys, which are discovered by each node broadcasting the key identifiers of its key ring. We make modifications to existing schemes to reduce communication overhead during the key discovery phase. This is achieved without weakening network connectivity or system resiliency against key compromise. We also introduce families of new deterministic key distribution schemes with low-communication overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSecurity in Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207