MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145599079 · doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00882-3

Cystinosis, cataract surgery, and corneal erosions

2001· article· en· W2145599079 on OpenAlexaff
Daragh Kennedy Fahey, Sinéad Fenton, Quresh Mohamed, Patricia Logan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Research and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhacoemulsificationMedicineCystinosisOphthalmologyCataract surgeryVisual acuityIntraocular lensSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 21-year-old man presented with severe corneal cystinosis and steroid-related cataract bilaterally. Rather than combined cataract surgery and penetrating keratoplasty, the patient had uneventful phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation after which visual acuity improved to 66 in both eyes. The outcome indicates that conventional phacoemulsification is sufficient in these cases. A guarded prognosis is advised in patients with cystinosis having cataract surgery as the fundal view is often impaired and there may be associated maculopathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cataract & Refractive SurgerySame topicBiomedical Research and PathophysiologyFrench-language works237,207