MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145599840 · doi:10.1260/0309-524x.33.6.649

Grid Impact of a 5.25 MW Wind Farm near St.Anthony, Newfoundland

2009· article· en· W2145599840 on OpenAlex
Sheikh Mominul Islam, M. Tariq Iqbal, John E. Quaicoe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueWind Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind speedWind powerGridTransmission linePeninsulaMeteorologyElectric power transmissionVoltageEnvironmental scienceMarine engineeringTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringGeographyEngineeringGeodesyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

St. Anthony is a town on the northern peninsula of Newfoundland. This region is connected to the Newfoundland island grid through a 248 km transmission line and has one of the best wind resources in Canada. In this paper, the wind speed data of the region as well as the sizing of a grid connected wind farm at Cape Norman near St. Anthony are presented. The dynamic model of the system, wind farm and the long transmission line are included in the paper. The dynamic model is simulated using Matlab/Simulink to determine system voltage and frequency variations. The study indicates that a 5.25 MW wind farm in this region will lead to a local voltage variation of about 7% and frequency variation of 0.7 Hz for a typical wind speed variation in that region. Such variations in a remote location like St. Anthony are considered acceptable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it