MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145605023 · doi:10.3968/7329

End-Result of Justice:Based on Hayek’s Social Theory

2015· article· en· W2145605023 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Haixia Li, Juwen Fu

Bibliographic record

VenueHigher education of social science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEthics in Business and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConnotationContradictionEconomic JusticeLaw and economicsOrder (exchange)SociologyLawState (computer science)Intervention (counseling)EpistemologyPolitical scienceEconomicsPsychologyPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hayek strongly defends individual freedom, advocates free competition and market order, and he is strongly against the intervention of state’s mandatory plan instruction. His whole social theory is concentrated on the discussion of free thought, and he emphatically expounded the importance and significance of individual freedom. The thought of justice, as the important part of his social theory, is the defense for individual freedom, so we can say that freedom is the end-result of justice. This article firstly talks about the connotation of justice and freedom and then extends to the standards, basis of distribution of justice until the contradiction of justice and free society, and then figure out the end-result of justice, namely free point of view.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.067
Scholarly communication0.0100.011
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.255
GPT teacher head0.487
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigher education of social scienceSame topicEthics in Business and EducationFrench-language works237,207