MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145609478 · doi:10.3749/canmin.47.4.871

INTERSECTING ISOGRADS IN REGIONALLY METAMORPHOSED SILICEOUS DOLOMITIC MARBLE OF THE SHARBOT LAKE DOMAIN, GRENVILLE PROVINCE, SOUTHEASTERN ONTARIO

2009· article· en· W2145609478 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
J.-A. S. Goodwin-Bell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this paper is to describe the mineralogy and petrology of siliceous, dolomitic marbles in the Sharbot Lake domain, as exposed in the Almonte – Carleton Place area of Ontario. Five isograds based on specific metamorphic reactions were mapped in the area. The delineation of the isograds is based on detailed mapping, petrographic analysis of assemblages of coexisting minerals, and a polybaric T– X (CO2) diagram, calculated using thermobarometric data from associated gneissic rocks. The T– X section is based on a field gradient of ~47°C/km. In order of increasing metamorphic grade, the isograds are: \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \[\mathit{Talc out}: 2 talc + 3 calcite = tremolite + dolomite + H\_{2}O + CO\_{2}\] \end{document} \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \[\mathit{Tremolite} + \mathit{Calcite in}: 5 dolomite + 8 quartz + H\_{2}O = tremolite + 3 calcite + 7 CO\_{2}\] \end{document} \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \[\mathit{Tremolite} + \mathit{K feldspar in}: 24 quartz + 6 calcite + 5 phlogopite = 3 tremolite + 5 K feldspar + 2 H\_{2}O + 6 CO\_{2}\] \end{document} \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \[\mathit{Diopside in}: tremolite + 3 calcite + 2 quartz = 5 diopside + 3 CO\_{2} + H\_{2}O\] \end{document} \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \[\mathit{Diopside} + \mathit{Dolomite in}: tremolite + 3 calcite = dolomite + 4 diopside + H\_{2}O + CO\_{2}\] \end{document} Mineral assemblages above and below each isograd are described, and relevant examples are shown. These isograds intersect in a manner that can be explained in terms of a fluid gradient in a mixed-volatile fluid (an example of fluid infiltration). Evidence for internal buffering of the mixed-volatile fluid is also presented. The locations of two isobaric invariant points in the study area have been identified by the intersection of the isograds and by determining the bracketing assemblages from above and below the invariant point. Data from this study suggest that the Sharbot Lake domain marble and associated rock in the area underwent regional metamorphism consistent with the greenschist- to amphibolite-facies conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207