MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145618985 · doi:10.1139/p04-071

Satellite-pointing retrieval from atmospheric limb-scattering of solar UV-B radiation

2004· article· en· W2145618985 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Johannes W. Kaiser, Christian von Savigny, K. ­U. Eichmann, Stefan Noël, H. Bovensmann, J. Frerick, John P. Burrows

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversität Zürich
KeywordsRadianceSatelliteRemote sensingPhysicsTangentOpticsGeometryGeologyAstronomyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new algorithm for tangent height retrievals from limb-scattering observations. These observations are performed by satellite-based spectrometers operating in the UV, visible, and short-wave IR spectral ranges. They record the solar radiation scattered in Earth's atmosphere in limb-viewing geometry and aim at vertically resolved retrievals of the atmospheric composition with global coverage. Inaccuracies in the knowledge of the instrument's pointing frequently dominate the error budgets of the atmospheric composition products. Therefore, additional information on satellite pointing is crucial for the quality of all products derived from limb-scattering observations. The information is commonly expressed in terms of the tangent heights. The presented algorithm determines the tangent heights directly from the observed limb radiances by analyzing the shapes of the so-called knee in several UV-B radiance profiles. All vertical pointing information contained in a UV-B fit window is exploited by simultaneously retrieving the ozone profile. The algorithm has been implemented in the toolbox SCIARAYS and named Tangent height Retrieval by UV-B Exploitation (TRUE) knee method. We have applied it to five orbits of SCIAMACHY's limb observations. It achieves a precision of about 200 m when applied to an individual limb scan. The broadband structure of the observations can be reproduced within 1% RMS. A comparison of the retrieved tangent heights with the engineering ones delivered by ESA reveals that the engineering tangent heights exhibit a systematic error, which varies with an amplitude of about 3 km. Its origin is traced to the on-board orbit model of Envisat. PACS Nos.: 94.80.+g, 42.68.Ay, 92.60.Ta, 42.68.Wt, 07.87.+v, 92.70.Cp, and 07.60.Rd

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207