MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145626423 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.140703

Recommendations on screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test

2014· article· en· W2145626423 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Neil R. Bell, Sarah Connor Gorber, Amanda Shane, Michel Joffres, Harminder Singh, James A. Dickinson, Elizabeth Shaw, Lesley Dunfield, Marcello Tonelli

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of ManitobaSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of AlbertaMcMaster UniversityAlberta Health ServicesManitoba Health
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsProstate cancerMedicineProstate-specific antigenCancerProstateProstate cancer screeningOncologyTest (biology)GynecologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

See related commentary on page [1201][1] and at [www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.141252][2] Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed non–skin cancer in men and the third leading cause of cancer-related death among men in Canada.[1][3] The current estimated lifetime risk of diagnosis is

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations223
Published2014
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207