MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145636454 · doi:10.1190/1.2387139

High-resolution wave-equation amplitude-variation-with-ray-parameter (AVP) imaging with sparseness constraints

2006· article· en· W2145636454 on OpenAlex
Juefu Wang, Mauricio D. Sacchi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsAlberta Glycomics CentreUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegularization (linguistics)AlgorithmSynthetic dataAmplitudeInverse problemConjugate gradient methodTotal variation denoisingComputer scienceA priori and a posterioriAmplitude versus offsetMathematicsArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)Mathematical analysisOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We propose a new scheme for high-resolution amplitude-variation-with-ray-parameter (AVP) imaging that uses nonquadratic regularization. We pose migration as an inverse problem and propose a cost function that uses a priori information about common-image gathers (CIGs). In particular, we introduce two regularization constraints: smoothness along the offset-ray-parameter axis and sparseness in depth. The two-step regularization yields high-resolution CIGs with robust estimates of AVP. We use an iterative reweighted least-squares conjugate gradient algorithm to minimize the cost function of the problem. We test the algorithm with synthetic data (a wedge model and the Marmousi data set) and a real data set (Erskine area, Alberta). Tests show our method helps to enhance the vertical resolution of CIGs and improves amplitude accuracy along the ray-parameter direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it