Properties of PET/clay nanocomposite films
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) nanocomposite films were prepared by cast extrusion followed by uniaxial stretching, using chill rolls. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD) showed that the clay layers were aligned in the machine direction (MD) in the PET/clay nanocomposite (PCN) films. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed that PCN films have higher crystallinity than the neat PET films, possibly due to the nucleating role of the silicate layers. The PCN films became hazier as the clay content increased, but the film transparency remained in the acceptable range. Oxygen permeability of the PCN films decreased by 23% compared to the neat PET film. This is comparable with predictions of models proposed in the literature. Silicate incorporation brought about 20% increase in the tensile modulus, while the puncture and tear propagation resistance were reduced, due to brittleness of the PCN films. The measured modulus (1.7 GPa) was somewhat smaller than the values predicted using the Pseudoinclusion model (2.1 GPa). POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it