MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145676188 · doi:10.1111/jen.12074

Antibiosis resistance to cereal leaf beetle, <i><scp>O</scp>ulema melanopus</i> (<scp>L</scp>.) (<scp>C</scp>oleoptera: <scp>C</scp>hrysomelidae), in <scp>C</scp>entral <scp>A</scp>sian wheat germplasm

2013· article· en· W2145676188 on OpenAlexafffundabout
S. V. Kher, Lloyd M. Dosdall, Héctor A. Cárcamo, M. El‐Bouhssini

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Entomology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Alberta
FundersWestern Grains Research FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Crop Industry Development Fund
KeywordsAntibiosisBiologyGermplasmPEST analysisGenotypeHorticultureGeneticsBacteriaGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The cereal leaf beetle, O ulema melanopus ( C oleoptera: C hrysomelidae), is a new invasive pest of cereals in western C anada. Host plant resistance is a potential option in the integrated management of this insect. Wheat ( T riticum aestivum L .) genotypes are known to possess antixenosis against O . melanopus ; however, mechanisms involving antibiosis are relatively less explored. We present results of an investigation exploring antibiotic resistance in wheat germplasm of C entral A sian origin with putative resistance to O . melanopus . Our laboratory assessment of development and survivorship of O . melanopus on test genotypes indicated antibiotic properties in four of the six genotypes evaluated. Antibiosis effects were reflected through lower survivorship, extended developmental periods and low adult fitness. However, two genotypes were excellent hosts, and beetles had higher survivorship and fitness on them. The performance of O . melanopus on these two genotypes was comparable to that on the susceptible genotype CDC GO included as a check. The genotypes with antibiotic resistance identified by this research can now serve as sources of genetic resistance for breeding cultivars adapted to western Canadian conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied EntomologySame topicInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlFrench-language works237,207