Effects of hypoxia-induced intrauterine growth restriction on cardiopulmonary structure and function during adulthood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), a condition affecting 7-15% of all pregnancies, is associated with an increased mortality rate during adulthood. Several animal models have been developed to study the effects of IUGR during adulthood. However, the in vivo characteristics of these models are still unknown. The main aim of this work was to evaluate, in vivo, the effects of IUGR on cardiopulmonary structure and function during adulthood. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pregnant Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to hypoxic (12% O2) or normoxic (21% O2) environments between day 15 and 21 of pregnancy. Offspring were raised to 4 or 12 months old when a complete in vivo echocardiographic study was performed. In addition, ex vivo morphometry and isolated working heart experiments were performed. At birth, pups exposed to hypoxia had a smaller body weight and larger heart/body weight than controls. At 4 months of age, there were no significant differences between the groups. At 12 months of age, male but not female offspring exposed to prenatal hypoxia had smaller body weights and signs of left ventricular hypertrophy. In addition, both male and females animals exposed to prenatal hypoxia showed in vivo and ex vivo signs of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension by 12 months of age. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that hypoxia-induced IUGR is associated with the development of chronic cardiopulmonary dysfunction during ageing. The implication of these findings is the potential usefulness of neonatal diagnosis as a predictor of cardiopulmonary outcomes during adulthood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".