← Back to cohort
Measurement of the inclusive isolated prompt photon cross-section in pp collisions at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si1.gif" overflow="scroll"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7</mml:mn><mml:mtext> TeV</mml:mtext></mml:math> using <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si2.gif" overflow="scroll"><mml:mn>35</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mtext> pb</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math> of ATLAS data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
Bibliographic record
VenuePhysics Letters B · 2011
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of TorontoYork UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaTRIUMFCarleton UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de MontréalUniversity of ReginaMcGill UniversityUniversity of Victoria
FundersAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungBundesministerium für Wissenschaft und ForschungArizona-Nevada Academy of ScienceJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchState Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOMLundbeckfondenGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloTRIUMFAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaDanmarks GrundforskningsfondMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)American Roentgen Ray SocietyH. Lundbeck A/SMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiCERN
KeywordsPseudorapidityPhysicsLuminosityParticle physicsPhotonQuantum chromodynamicsLarge Hadron ColliderHadronNuclear physicsCross section (physics)Perturbative QCDPhoton energyAstrophysicsOpticsCharged particleAstronomyQuantum mechanics
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.999
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations109
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractno