Stratégies RSE-BOP et Soin des Communautés Humaines. Concepts et Propositions Génériques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parmi les nombreuses pratiques de stratégies de responsabilité sociale, l’une requiert un engagement fort de l’entreprise sur le territoire, c’est-à-dire de ses compétences, de sa gouvernance et de son management : la RSE-BOP (Martinet, Payaud, 2008a, 2008b, 2009). La RSE-BOP est inspirée de « La base de la pyramide » (« Bottom of the pyramid ») de Prahalad (2004) qui désigne les 4 milliards d’individus disposant de moins de deux dollars par jour et qui suggère aux entreprises de reconsidérer ce faible pouvoir d’achat et de s’intéresser à ces nouveaux consommateurs. L’article esquisse un cadre conceptuel destiné au management stratégique de projets d’entreprise s’inscrivant dans une telle perspective. Ainsi, il présente la RSE-BOP comme une forme avancée de la RSE et une voie pour l’aide au développement des pays les plus pauvres, développe les fondements théoriques du cadre conceptuel et les conditions de mise en oeuvre d’une RSE-BOP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".