MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145718885

Sedentary “tweens” at higher risk for heart disease

2002· article· en· W2145718885 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jennifer Jones

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStroke (engine)Heart diseaseMedicineSedentary lifestyleStroke riskDiseaseSedentary behaviorGerontologyPhysical therapyPhysical activityCardiologyInternal medicineIschemic strokeEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A coroner's inquest may be held into the deaths of 8 patients at the same hospital who had been prescribed the antireflux medication cisapride.The drug was withdrawn from the Canadian market in August 2000 (see CMAJ 2001;165[10]:1370).Information about the deaths at the Joseph Brant Memorial Hospital in Burlington, Ont., emerged after a hospital pharmacist, Sana Sukkari, made a report to Health Canada about the cases last year.All 8 patients, who ranged in age from 54 to 84, were seriously ill and received treatment in the intensive care ward between June 1998 and March 2000.Treatment with cisapride was contraindicated in all cases.Dr. Karen Acheson, regional coroner for Halton, is investigating the medical causes and circumstances surrounding the deaths in order to decide whether an inquest is warranted.Cisapride was already at the centre of a coroner's inquest involving the death of 15-year-old Vanessa Young, an Ontario girl who died of a cardiac arrhythmia in March 2000.In that case, the coroner's jury made 14 recommendations aimed at improving Health Canada's drug-monitoring system.-CMAJ

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207