Structural Requirements of Tom40 for Assembly into Preexisting TOM Complexes of Mitochondria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tom40 is the major subunit of the translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane (the TOM complex). To study the assembly pathway of Tom40, we have followed the integration of the protein into the TOM complex in vitro and in vivo using wild-type and altered versions of the Neurospora crassa Tom40 protein. Upon import into isolated mitochondria, Tom40 precursor proteins lacking the first 20 or the first 40 amino acid residues were assembled as the wild-type protein. In contrast, a Tom40 precursor lacking residues 41 to 60, which contains a highly conserved region of the protein, was arrested at an intermediate stage of assembly. We constructed mutant versions of Tom40 affecting this region and transformed the genes into a sheltered heterokaryon containing a tom40 null nucleus. Homokaryotic strains expressing the mutant Tom40 proteins had growth rate defects and were deficient in their ability to form conidia. Analysis of the TOM complex in these strains by blue native gel electrophoresis revealed alterations in electrophoretic mobility and a tendency to lose Tom40 subunits from the complex. Thus, both in vitro and in vivo studies implicate residues 41 to 60 as containing a sequence required for proper assembly/stability of Tom40 into the TOM complex. Finally, we found that TOM complexes in the mitochondrial outer membrane were capable of exchanging subunits in vitro. A model is proposed for the integration of Tom40 subunits into the TOM complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".