MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The serological and genetic basis of the <i>cis</i>‐AB blood group in Korea

2004· article· en· W2145778405 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVox Sanguinis · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerologyGenotypeAlleleRestriction fragment length polymorphismBiologyPolymerase chain reactionMolecular biologyGeneticsPolymorphism (computer science)PhenotypeGroup BGroup AGeneMedicineAntibodyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The cis-AB blood group is rare, although relatively common amongst Koreans. The serological characteristics and genetic basis of Korean cis-AB blood donors were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), designed to detect the cis-AB01 allele, was performed on 194 AB samples which demonstrated weak or unusual expression of either or both of the A or B antigens. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Sixty cis-AB01 donors were identified. cis-AB01/O01 or O02 were the most common genotypes (36/60) detected only in A(2)B(3) donors, and cis-AB01/B101 (nine of 60) was the least common genotype identified only in A(2)B donors. Surprisingly cis-AB01/A102 (15/60) was identified in a variety of phenotypes (A(1)B(3), A(1)B(x) or el, A(int)B(3)).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it