Primary Basaloid Carcinoma of the Nipple with Associated Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Situ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Basaloid carcinomas have been documented in various anatomic locations. We describe a primary invasive adenocarcinoma of the nipple with extensive basaloid features that was also associated with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in situ and an aggressive behavior. A 69-year-old woman without a history of breast neoplasia presented with right nipple pain. Biopsy of the nipple revealed SCC in situ. One year later, she returned with nipple ulceration. An excisional specimen showed a 1.7 cm nodule composed of invasive sheets and ribbons of basaloid cells with numerous mitoses, extensive tumor necrosis and evidence of glandular differentiation. SCC in situ was present in the overlying epidermis. The differential diagnosis included a primary basaloid adenocarcinoma of the nipple, basal cell carcinoma of the nipple, neuroendocrine carcinoma, melanoma, basaloid variant of adenoid cystic carcinoma and metastatic disease. Immunohistochemical profile of this tumor supported a primary basaloid adenocarcinoma of the nipple. Although the initial sentinel lymph node biopsy was negative, within a year of diagnosis, the patient developed ipsilateral axillary node and pulmonary metastases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of basaloid carcinoma to be documented in this anatomic site.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".