MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145784838

CMOS photodetectors and imaging systems for biomedical applications

2009· article· en· W2145784838 on OpenAlexaff
M. Jamal Deen

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers and Devices for Communication, 2009. CODEC 2009. 4th International Conference on · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotodetectorCMOSSensitivity (control systems)Image sensorComputer scienceProcess (computing)Medical imagingElectronic engineeringMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsEngineeringArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we discuss in detail photodetectors and imaging systems, fabricated in mainstream CMOS technology, that are suitable for high-speed, high-sensitivity biological and medical applications. The viability of some of the designs has been verified using device simulation tools and theoretical models. Several pixel structures available in a commercial CMOS process will be compared and their optical response characteristics contrasted. Finally, an imaging system fabricated in a standard CMOS 0.18 micron technology, will be described. Compared to other methods that implement the high-sensitivity photodetectors on a separate die, this system offers higher integration and functionality at a lower price. The system will operate at low power levels, and has the potential to be integrated into larger systems. It can also be a template system that is easily adapted for a wide range of high-speed, high sensitivity biomedical imaging applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputers and Devices for Communication, 2009. CODEC 2009. 4th International Conference onSame topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207