S’abstenir des preuves : influences globales et sélections locales dans l’éducation sexuelle au Malawi1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se penche sur le cas de l’éducation sexuelle auprès des jeunes au Malawi pour illustrer la manière dont différents discours mondialisés sont repris et adoptés dans des circonstances sociales, culturelles et politiques spécifiques. Tandis que le conservatisme chrétien issu du mouvement évangéliste américain est largement adopté par les intervenants malawites, les « meilleures pratiques » de la santé publique, ancrées dans les preuves scientifiques et dans le respect des droits humains, semblent n’être mises en oeuvre que partiellement. L’éducation sexuelle malawite est donc largement paralysée par l’impossibilité de mettre en oeuvre des programmes dont l’efficacité a été démontrée, au profit d’une promotion de l’abstinence qui épargne les sensibilités mais n’aide en rien les jeunes à diminuer les risques liés à la sexualité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".