The necessity of maximum information utilization in x‐ray analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract There are significant discrepancies in the experimental data needed in the analysis of x‐ray spectra. Examination of the data in detail shows that they often contradict simple logic, elemental arithmetic, even parity and angular momentum conservation laws. We have identified that the main source of the problems, other than the human factor, is rooted in the signal processing electronics. We have developed a line of fully digital signal processors that not only have excellent resolution and line shape but also allow proper accounting. We achieve this by processing all events and separating them into two or more spectra where the first spectrum is the accepted or good spectrum and the second spectrum is the rejected spectrum. It is not enough to know that an event was rejected, and increment the input counter—it is necessary to know what happened and why, whether it was pure noise, a noisy or disturbed event, a true event, or any pile up combination of the above in order to account properly for true event input rate and processor dead time. The data processing methodology cannot be reliably established on the partial and fractional information offered by other approaches. The availability of all the events allows one to see the other part of the spectrum. To our surprise the total information explains many of the shortcomings and contradictions of the x‐ray database. We call this a maximum information utilization approach in signal processing. Also a fundamental parameter x‐ray fluorescence analysis program (CSX‐XRF) has been developed to utilize all the information offered by the signal processor. The fundamental parameter method is only as good as the database it uses and the description of the x‐ray fluorescence analysis system. This latter poses significant difficulties, and to ease the demand we have developed an inverse fundamental parameter program package for x‐ray tube based equipment characterization. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it