MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145822939 · doi:10.1109/tns.2011.2162745

Novel Soft Error Robust Flip-Flops in 65nm CMOS

2011· article· en· W2145822939 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiation Effects in Electronics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersTRIUMFCMC Microsystems
KeywordsFLOPSCMOSSoft errorFlip-flopRobustness (evolution)Single event upsetSequential logicElectronic circuitLogic gateElectronic engineeringComputer scienceUpsetParallel computingEngineeringElectrical engineeringStatic random-access memory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cosmic neutron-induced single event upsets have become a dominant failure mechanism in sub-100 nm CMOS memory and logic circuits. In this paper two SEU-robust flip-flops are described which are based on a hardened storage cell, known as the Quatro cell. One flip-flop utilizes C <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> MOS gates while the other utilizes a pulsed-latch architecture. The proposed flip-flops exhibit as much as a 50% improvement in power-delay product when compared with recently reported hardened flip-flops. A test chip containing the proposed flip-flops arranged in a shift register configuration was fabricated in a 65 nm CMOS process. Accelerated neutron radiation testing results show that the proposed flip-flops have excellent soft-error robustness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it