MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145835133 · doi:10.1109/lcn.2006.322074

An Adaptive Non-preemptive Scheduling Framework for Delay Bounded Traffic in Cellular Networks

2006· article· en· W2145835133 on OpenAlexafffund
Yaser Khamayseh, Ehab S. Elmallah

Bibliographic record

VenueConference on Local Computer Networks · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkScheduling (production processes)ProvisioningTraffic generation modelWireless networkSoftware deploymentDistributed computingCellular networkOnline algorithmWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Provisioning multimedia streaming services to mobile users in next generation wireless networks is considered critical to the successful deployment of such networks. Streaming traffic is characterized by the need of relatively high data transmission rates, and the need to limit the wireless network delays during transmission. Such factors contribute to the importance of the design and use of scheduling mechanisms that work at the streaming connection level to manage network resources. In this paper, we consider the problem of designing schedulers that aim at maximizing the achieved throughput subject to constraints on the maximum acceptable delay that can be tolerated by each traffic stream. We propose an adaptive scheduling framework for the non-preemptive delivery of traffic streams in cellular networks where a fixed number of channels are allocated to streaming services. The obtained simulation results indicate the competitiveness of the proposed design when used online to control traffic, and the usefulness of the underlying algorithms when used offline to analyze traffic traces

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference on Local Computer NetworksSame topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207