A PBPK Modeling-Based Approach to Account for Interactions in the Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objectives of the present study were: (1) to develop a risk assessment methodology for chemical mixtures that accounts for pharmacokinetic interactions among components, and (2) to apply this methodology to assess the health risk associated with occupational inhalation exposure to airborne mixtures of dichloromethane, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and m-xylene. The basis of the proposed risk assessment methodology relates to the characterization of the change in tissue dose metrics (e.g., area under the concentration-time curve for parent chemical in tissues [AUCtissue], maximal concentration of parent chemical or metabolite [Cmax], quantity metabolized over a period of time) in humans, during mixed exposures using PBPK models. For systemic toxicants, an interaction-based hazard index was calculated using data on tissue dose of mixture constituents. Initially, the AUCtarget tissue (AUCtt) corresponding to guideline values (e.g., threshold limit value [TLV]) of individual chemicals were obtained. Then, the AUCtt for each chemical during mixed exposure was obtained using a mixture PBPK model that accounted for the binary and higher order interactions occurring within the mixture. An interaction-based hazard index was then calculated for each toxic effect by summing the ratio of AUCtt obtained during mixed exposure (predefined mixture) and single exposure (TLV). For the carcinogenic constituents of the mixture, an interaction-based response additivity approach was applied. This method consisted of adding the cancer risk for each constituent, calculated as the product of q*tissue dose and AUCtt. The AUCtt during mixture exposures was obtained using an interaction-based PBPK model. The approaches developed in the present study permit, for the first time, the consideration of the impact of multichemical pharmacokinetic interactions at a quantitative level in mixture risk assessments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".