MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145850802 · doi:10.1099/ijs.0.2008/001198-0

Metschnikowia cubensis sp. nov., a yeast species isolated from flowers in Cuba

2008· article· en· W2145850802 on OpenAlexaff
A. Fidalgo-Jimenez, Heide‐Marie Daniel, P. Évrard, C. Decock, Marc‐André Lachance

Bibliographic record

VenueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologySubcladeBotanyPhylogenetic treeTaxonomy (biology)AscosporeAllotypeGenusCladeGeneticsGeneSpore

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel yeast species is described from 19 strains isolated from flowers and insects in three provinces of Cuba. The species is so far known only from Cuba. Characteristic asci and ascospores as well as phylogenetic analysis of the rDNA sequence place the novel species in the genus Metschnikowia. The novel species belongs to the New World subclade of large-spored species of Metschnikowia. Mating tests with other members of the subclade resulted in the formation of sterile asci without ascospores, showing that the Cuban strains represent a distinct biological species. Intraspecies matings lead to the production of fertile asci containing large needle-shaped ascospores. The novel species was further distinguished from its close relatives by rDNA sequences and PCR fingerprinting using primers derived from mini- and microsatellites. We propose the name Metschnikowia cubensis sp. nov. and designate MUCL 45753(T) (=CRGF 279(T) =CBS 10832(T), h(+)) as the type strain and MUCL 45751 (=CRGF 278 =CBS 10833, h(-)) as the allotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGYSame topicYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFrench-language works237,207