Brazilian Snail-eating Snakes (Reptilia, Serpentes, Dipsadidae) and their Alimentary Preferences by Terrestrial Molluscs (Gastropoda, Gymnophila & Pulmonata): an Preliminary Overview
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An ecological study and preliminary revision concerning the snail-eating snakes and potential “prey” (alimentary preferences) present in the Brazilian country region, integral geographical territory of the “Atlantic Slope of the South Cone” is presented here based on wide bibliographical revision, the examination of specimens contained in collections of regional natural history museums, consultation with specialists, and the eventual collection of specimens in the environment. Around 17 species of snakes exclusively on the feed on slugs and snails, belonging to the family Dipsadiidae, including the genus Dipsas (9 species), Sibon (1 species) and Sibynomorphus (5 species) – the subfamily Dipsadinae (nocturnal arboreal and/or terrestrial forms) - and Tomodon (2 species), the subfamily Xenodontinae and Tribe Tachymenini (diurnal habits, terrestrial forms). A total of seven native nominal slugs and two snails they were confirmed in progress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it