MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145909957 · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3000

All-optical electrophysiology in mammalian neurons using engineered microbial rhodopsins

2014· article· en· W2145909957 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel R. Hochbaum, Yongxin Zhao, Samouil L. Farhi, Nathan C Klapoetke, Christopher A. Werley, Vikrant Kapoor, Peng Zou, Joel M. Kralj, Dougal Maclaurin, Niklas Smedemark-Margulies, Jessica L. Saulnier, Gabriella L. Boulting, Christoph Straub, Yong Ku Cho, Michael Melkonian, Gane Ka‐Shu Wong, D. Jed Harrison, Venkatesh N. Murthy, Bernardo L. Sabatini, Edward S. Boyden, Robert E. Campbell, Adam E. Cohen

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Methods · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDivision of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport SystemsNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyAlberta InnovatesDivision of Emerging Frontiers in Research and InnovationNew York Stem Cell FoundationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyUniversity of AlbertaDefense Advanced Research Projects AgencyNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringSkolkovo Institute of Science and TechnologyNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication DisordersNational Institute on Drug AbuseAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsChannelrhodopsinElectrophysiologyVoltage-sensitive dyeOptogeneticsMicrosecondBiophysicsNeuroscienceBiologyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations825
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature MethodsSame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207