Hybrid Extended Particle Filter (HEPF) for integrated civilian navigation system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Integration of complementary systems like inertial navigation system (INS) and Global Positioning System (GPS), improves navigation parameters accuracy. Currently, integrated navigation systems are commonly implemented using extended Kalman filter (EKF) and unscented Kalman filter (UKF). The EKF assumes linear process and measurement models while UKF generates sigma points using the real mean and standard deviation of data. However, both EKF and UKF assume the noise to be Gaussian, which is unrealistic for highly nonlinear systems. To overcome these limitations, particle filter (PF) was proposed lately which is a non-parametric filter and hence can easily deal with non-linearity and non-Gaussian noises. In this paper, hybrid extended particle filter (HEPF) is developed as an alternative to the EKF to achieve better navigation accuracy for low-cost micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS) sensors. Experimental GPS/INS datasets consisting of GPS carrier phase data and inertial measurements from low-cost MEMS-grade inertial measurement unit (IMU) is used to evaluate the proposed HEPF. The HEPF performance is compared to that of other estimation techniques such as the EKF. The results show that both HEPF and EKF provide comparable navigation results during periods without GPS outages. However in cases when GPS outages are simulated, HEPF performs much better than the EKF, especially when simulated outages are located during periods with high vehicle dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".