MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145953112 · doi:10.1530/rep-07-0053

Nodal signalling and apoptosis

2007· review· en· W2145953112 on OpenAlexafffund
Hongmei Wang, Benjamin K. Tsang

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTGF-β signaling in diseases
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsNODALActivin receptorNodal signalingActivin type 2 receptorsBiologyCell biologySMADReceptorACVR2BTrophoblastTransforming growth factorEndocrinologyCancer researchInternal medicineTGF beta signaling pathwayPlacentaEmbryoGeneticsMedicineEmbryogenesisPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nodal, a member of the transforming growth factor beta family, was first cloned from a 7.5 day post-coitum mouse embryo cDNA library. Nodal exerts its biological effects by signalling through its types I and II serine/threonine kinase receptor complex and intracellular Smad proteins. The type II receptors for Nodal are Activin type II receptors ActRIIA and ActRIIB, whereas the putative type I receptors are Activin receptor like kinase (ALK) 4 and ALK7. The main Smad proteins involved in Nodal signalling are Smad2 and Smad3. Studies of Nodal in adult tissues indicate that it is pro-apoptotic in rat ovarian granulosa cells, human trophoblast cells and human ovarian epithelial cancer cells and is growth inhibitory in the latter two cell types. This review summarises the progress made on the functions of Nodal in the apoptosis of adult tissues, especially in the ovary and placenta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproductionSame topicTGF-β signaling in diseasesFrench-language works237,207