MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145954987 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014703

The fundamental plane of EDisCS galaxies

2010· article· en· W2145954987 on OpenAlexaff
R. P. Saglia, P. Sánchez–Blázquez, R. Bender, L. Simard, Vandana Desai, Alfonso Aragón‐Salamanca, B. Milvang‐Jensen, C. Halliday, P. Jablonka, Stefan Noll, Bianca M. Poggianti, Douglas Clowe, G. De Lucia, R. Pelló, Gregory Rudnick, T. Valentinuzzi, Simon D. M. White, Dennis Zaritsky

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilDanmarks GrundforskningsfondDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Research Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsVelocity dispersionFundamental plane (elliptical galaxies)GalaxyStellar massRedshiftGalaxy clusterSigmaLuminosityElliptical galaxyLenticular galaxyGalaxy groupBrightest cluster galaxyGalaxy formation and evolutionAstronomyStar formation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the evolution of spectral early-type galaxies in clusters, groups, and the field up to redshift 0.9 using the ESO Distant Cluster Survey (EDisCS) dataset. We measure structural parameters (circularized half-luminosity radii R e , surface brightness I e , and velocity dispersions ) for 154 cluster and 68 field galaxies. On average, we achieve precisions of 10% in R e , 0.1 dex in log I e , and 10% in . We sample 20% of cluster and 10% of field spectral early-type galaxies to an I band magnitude in a 1 arcsec radius aperture as faint as I 1 = 22. We study the evolution of the zero point of the fundamental plane (FP) and confirm results in the literature, but now also for the low cluster velocity dispersion regime. Taken at face value, the mass-to-light ratio varies as log M/L B = (-0.54 0.01)z = (-1.61 0.01) log(1 + z) in clusters, independent of their velocity dispersion. The evolution is stronger ( log M/L B = (-0.76 0.01)z = (-2.27 0.03) log(1 + z)) for field galaxies. A somewhat milder evolution is derived if a correction for incompleteness is applied. A rotation in the FP with redshift is detected with low statistical significance. The and FP coefficients decrease with redshift, or, equivalently, the FP residuals correlate with galaxy mass and become progressively negative at low masses. The effect is visible at z 0.7 for cluster galaxies and at lower redshifts z 0.5 for field galaxies. We investigate the size evolution of our galaxy sample. In agreement with previous results, we find that the half-luminosity radius for a galaxy with a dynamical or stellar mass of 2 10 11 M varies as (1 + z) -1.00.3 for both cluster and field galaxies. At the same time, stellar velocity dispersions grow with redshift, as (1 + z) 0.590.10 at constant dynamical mass, and as (1 + z) 0.340.14 at constant stellar mass. The measured size evolution reduces to R e (1 + z) -0.50.2 and (1 + z) 0.410.08 , at fixed dynamical masses, and R e (1 + z) -0.680.4 and (1 + z) 0.190.10 , at fixed stellar masses, when the progenitor bias (PB, galaxies that locally are of spectroscopic early-type, but are not very old, disappear progressively from the EDisCS high-redshift sample; often these galaxies happen to be large in size) is taken into account. Taken together, the variations in size and velocity dispersion imply that the luminosity evolution with redshift derived from the zero point of the FP is somewhat milder than that derived without taking these variations into account. When considering dynamical masses, the effects of size and velocity dispersion variations almost cancel out. For stellar masses, the luminosity evolution is reduced to L B (1 + z) 1.0 for cluster galaxies and L B (1 + z) 1.67 for field galaxies. Using simple stellar population models to translate the observed luminosity evolution into a formation age, we find that massive (>10 11 M ) cluster galaxies are old (with a formation redshift z f > 1.5) and lower mass galaxies are 3-4 Gyr younger, in agreement with previous EDisCS results from color and line index analyses. This confirms the picture of a progressive build-up of the red sequence in clusters with time. Field galaxies follow the same trend, but are 1 Gyr younger at a given redshift and mass. Taking into account the size and velocity dispersion evolution quoted above pushes all formation ages upwards by 1 to 4 Gyr.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207