Les paroxysmes de la conciliation. Violence au travail et violence du conjoint
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé L’enquête nationale sur les violences envers les femmes en France (enquête Enveff) apporte sur la conciliation entre travail et famille un éclairage supplémentaire, différent de ce que révèle d’ordinaire le seul angle des contraintes spatio-temporelles. Alors que les inégalités entre les sexes ont souvent été analysées au travers des contraintes qui s’imposent aux femmes dans le travail et la famille, les hommes bénéficiant d’une liberté tangible, l’enquête Enveff permet de mettre directement en relation les situations de violence repérées au cours des douze derniers mois dans la vie de travail avec les situations de vie en couple. Le caractère multiforme de la violence est analysé en prenant en compte les divers types de violences interpersonnelles, verbales, psychologiques, physiques et sexuelles, perpétrées dans le cadre du travail et par le conjoint. Dans la majorité des cas, activité professionnelle et vie maritale n’apparaissent pas incompatibles, à condition d’accomplir la conciliation des deux vies dans l’harmonie, car la moindre difficulté ouvre la voie à des effets cumulatifs de violences dans les deux sphères.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".