MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146043620 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2004.1326779

A combined LPC-based speech coder and filtered-X LMS algorithm for acoustic echo cancellation

2004· article· en· W2146043620 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDecorrelationSpeech recognitionFinite impulse responseEcho (communications protocol)AlgorithmLinear predictionAdaptive filterImpulse responseLeast mean squares filterSpeech processingRate of convergenceSpeech codingMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel acoustic echo canceller structure based on combining the filtered-X LMS algorithm with an LPC-based speech coder for use in videoconferencing and VoIP. The algorithm updates coefficients using filtered versions of the input and error signals obtained by directly tapping the short-term excitation signal from the speech decoder, and by filtering the error signal with a bank of FIR decorrelation filters constructed from the LPC synthesis filter coefficients. The proposed algorithm was implemented using ITU G.729, and simulation results with 2000-tap room impulse responses show a faster and more constant rate of convergence than NLMS using speech input signals and an average 10 dB greater ERLE observed during convergence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207