MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146045281 · doi:10.1109/tpami.2004.1262180

Nonparametric multiscale energy-based model and its application in some imagery problems

2004· article· en· W2146045281 on OpenAlexaff
Max Mignotte

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonparametric statisticsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceRegularization (linguistics)Energy minimizationPattern recognition (psychology)Rendering (computer graphics)SegmentationMinificationMultiresolution analysisMathematical optimizationComputer visionAlgorithmMathematicsWaveletWavelet transform

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the use of a nonparametric regularization energy term for devising a example-based rendering and segmentation technique. We have stated this problem in the multiresolution energy minimization framework and exploited the multiscale structure proposed by Wei and Levoy for the texture synthesis problem. In this nonparametric energy minimization framework, we also propose a computationally efficient coarse-to-fine recursive optimization method to minimize the cost function related to this hierarchical model. In this context, the formulation of our example-based regularization term also allows to directly infer an intuitive dissimilarity measure between two contour shapes. This measure is herein exploited to define an efficient shape descriptor for the contour-based shape recognition and indexing problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine IntelligenceSame topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207