Quality of life of elderly people attended by the Family Health Strategy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo: Avaliar a qualidade de vida de idosos inseridos na Estratégia Saúde da Família. Método: Estudo transversal, descritivo-exploratório, quantitativo, realizado nos domicílios de idosos da zona urbana do município de Floriano – PI. A amostra constituiu-se por 671 idosos. A coleta de dados foi realizada utilizando o WHOQOL-Bref e um questionário para obtenção de informações sociodemográficas. As associações foram realizadas por testes Quiquadrado e análise de agrupamento hierárquico. Resultados: Houve predominância do sexo feminino (65,3%). A maioria dos idosos vivia sem companheiro, no âmbito familiar, com renda mensal de 1 a 3 salários mínimos e possuía qualidade de vida muito boa (66,2%), sendo maior proporção para o sexo masculino (69,5%), com diferença significativa entre os sexos (p=0,021). Conclusão: A maioria dos idosos pesquisados possuía boa qualidade de vida segundo os escores dos domínios avaliados pelo WHOQOL-Bref, apresentando maiores escores para o domínio das relações sociais e menor para o domínio meio ambiente.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".