MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146049124 · doi:10.4039/n03-069

Review of the<i>Ocalea</i>group of genera (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae) in Canada and Alaska: new taxa, bionomics, and distribution

2004· article· en· W2146049124 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jan Klimaszewski, Georges Pelletier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Entomologist · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNearctic ecozoneBionomicsEcologyType localityGeographyTaxonGenusBiologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A review of the Nearctic genera and Canadian and Alaskan species of theOcaleagroup is presented. Ten genera are treated, with five erected as new:AlfocaleaKlimaszewskigen. nov.(type species:A. montanaKlimaszewskisp. nov.),BetocaleaKlimaszewskigen. nov.(type species:B. pacificaKlimaszewskisp. nov.),GennadotaCasey (reinstated),LongipeltinaBernhauer,MegocaleaKlimaszewskigen. nov.(type species:M. lemieuxiKlimaszewskisp. nov.),MetocaleaKlimaszewskigen. nov.(type species:M. lindgreniKlimaszewskisp. nov.),Neoisoglossa(Casey) (nomen novum),NeothetaliaKlimaszewskigen. nov.(type species:N. nimia(Casey)),OcaleaErichson (restricted definition), andParocaleaBernhauer. Twenty-four species of theOcaleagroup are here recognized in the Nearctic region, fourteen of which occur in Canada. Six new species are described from western Canada and Alaska:Neothetalia smetanaiKlimaszewskisp. nov.(Canada: British Columbia),Neothetalia canadianaKlimaszewskisp. nov.(Canada: British Columbia, Yukon Territory; United States: Alaska),Betocalea pacifica(Canada: British Columbia),Alfocalea montana(Canada: Alberta, British Columbia),Metocalea lindgreni(Canada: British Columbia), andMegocalea lemieuxi(Canada: British Columbia). The first record ofNeoisoglossa agnita(Casey) in Alberta is provided. Two nominal species,Atheta(Athetalia)bicarnicepsCasey (=Neoisoglossa) andIsoglossa grandicollis(Casey) (=Neoisoglossa), are here synonymized withNeoisoglossa arcuata(Casey).Aleochara pallitarsisKirby has been transferred to the genusNeothetaliaand is newly recorded from Alaska and British Columbia.Ocalea columbianaKlimaszewski has been transferred toNeothetaliaand is newly recorded from Alaska.Neothetalia pallitarsiswas formerly recorded from an unknown locality in North America andNeothetalia columbianafrom the Carmanah Valley on Vancouver Island.Neothetalia nimiais newly recorded from Alaska. A new generic classification is proposed to accommodate species of the NearcticOcaleagroup. New data are provided on the systematics, relationships, bionomics, and distribution of the Nearctic species and genera of America north of Mexico. Diagnoses, colour images of entire bodies, and line illustrations of genital features are provided for those Canadian and Alaskan species that were not formerly illustrated, and their collection localities are plotted on maps. A key to Nearctic genera of theOcaleagroup and the species occurring in Canada and Alaska is presented. The lectotypes have been designated for the following nominal species because the original series consisted of syntypes or represented mixed species or both sexes but with males bearing a better diagnostic set of characters:Aleochara picataStephens (=Ocalea),Atheta(Athetalia)bicarniceps,Atheta(Athetalia)nimiaCasey (=Neothetalia),Atheta(Athetalia)repensaCasey (=Neoisoglossa),Isoglossa arcuataCasey (=Neoisoglossa),Ocalea agnitaCasey (=Neoisoglossa),Ocalea franciscanaCasey (=Neoisoglossa),Ocalea fuscaFenyes (=Neoisoglossa),Ocalea grandicollisCasey (=Neoisoglossa),Pyroglossa grossaBernhauer,Rheobioma disjunctaCasey (=Neoisoglossa),Rheobioma marcidaCasey (=Neoisoglossa), andRheobioma terrenaCasey (=Neoisoglossa).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian EntomologistSame topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207