MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146054110 · doi:10.1109/cnsr.2009.13

Carrier Frequency Offset Mitigation in OFDM Systems Using Efficient Tone Reservation

2009· article· en· W2146054110 on OpenAlexaff
A. Ghassemi, T. Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingCarrier frequency offsetFast Fourier transformOrthogonalityFrequency offsetComputer scienceTransmitterInterference (communication)ReservationElectronic engineeringFrequency-division multiplexingTone (literature)AlgorithmReduction (mathematics)Offset (computer science)TelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the major drawbacks of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) is sensitivity to carrier frequency offset (CFO) caused by a mismatch between the transmitter and receiver oscillators. CFO destroys the orthogonality of the subcarriers and introduces intercarrier interference (ICI), reducing the system performance. Previously, tone reservation (TR) was considered for reducing the peak interference-to-carrier ratio (PICR) and shown to provide significant PICR reduction. In this paper, we use submatrices of the inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) and fast Fourier transform (FFT) to reduce the number of variables in the optimization to efficiently compute the optimal tones. Performance results are presented which demonstrate that the proposed algorithm yields PICR performance similar to that with the previous TR technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207