MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146058742

FX Singular Spectrum Analysis

2009· article· en· W2146058742 on OpenAlexaff
Mauricio D. Sacchi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical and numerical algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingular spectrum analysisSingular value decompositionDeconvolutionMathematicsNoise (video)Singular valueAlgorithmNoise reductionMatrix (chemical analysis)TrajectoryApplied mathematicsSeries (stratigraphy)Computer scienceArtificial intelligencePhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Singular spectrum analysis (SSA) is a method utilized for the analysis of time series arising from dynamical systems. The method is used to capture oscillations from a given time series via the analysis of the eigenspectra of the so-called trajectory matrix. The trajectory matrix is composed of multiple data views. The singular value decomposition (SVD) of the trajectory matrix can be used for rank reduction and noise elimination. We apply SSA in the FX domain and present a comparison with classical FX deconvolution. The algorithm arising from SSA analysis is equivalent to Cadzow FX noise attenuation, a method recently proposed by Trickett (2008). It is important to stress, however, that Cadzow filtering (Cadzow, 1988) is a general framework for noise reduction of signals and images. Cadzow filtering is equivalent to SSA when considering sinusoidal waveforms immersed in additive random noise. The intention of this abstract is to provide a simple explanation of the basic assumptions made in SSA and its application to the modeling of plane waves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStatistical and numerical algorithmsFrench-language works237,207