MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146073512 · doi:10.1080/10837450802309679

Controlled Release of DSBP from Genipin-Crosslinked Gelatin Thin Films

2008· article· en· W2146073512 on OpenAlexaff
Alireza Abbasi, Morteza Eslamian, Darrick V Heyd, Dérick Rousseau

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmaceutical Development and Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenipinGelatinThin filmTransdermalMaterials scienceSubstrate (aquarium)Controlled releaseChromatographyFabricationChemical engineeringDiffusionDrug carrierBiomedical engineeringDrug deliveryNanotechnologyChemistryOrganic chemistryChitosanMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Controlled release of a marker drug, 4,4'-bis(2-sulfostyryl) biphenyl (DSBP) from genipin crosslinked gelatin thin films, with application to drug delivery by transdermal patches is studied in this paper. A simple method for fabrication of nano-thin films, using basic lab equipment is introduced. This method consists of two steps: dipping of the substrate in a deposition solution, followed by centrifugation of the substrate. Also, swelling and drug release from thin films is modeled, using the Fick's second law of diffusion. The effect of genipin concentration on release of DSBP molecules from thin films is investigated, experimentally and numerically. The results show that controlled release of DSBP from the genipin-crosslinked gelatin thin films is achieved, using various concentrations of genipin in gelatin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmaceutical Development and TechnologySame topicAdvancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207