MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146107935 · doi:10.1002/acs.820

Identification of dual‐rate systems based on finite impulse response models

2004· article· en· W2146107935 on OpenAlexaff
Feng Ding, Tongwen Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpulse responseInteger (computer science)Finite impulse responseDual (grammatical number)Identification (biology)Computer scienceNoise (video)System identificationLeast-squares function approximationAlgorithmImpulse (physics)Sampling (signal processing)Parameter identification problemMathematical optimizationControl theory (sociology)MathematicsModel parameterStatisticsArtificial intelligenceData modelingFilter (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Two identification algorithms, a least squares and a correlation analysis based, are developed for dual‐rate stochastic systems in which the output sampling period is an integer multiple of the input updating period. The basic idea is to use auxiliary FIR models to predict unmeasurable noise‐free (true) outputs, and then use these and system inputs to identify parameters of underlying fast single‐rate models. The simulation results indicate that the proposed algorithms are effective. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations114
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal ProcessingSame topicControl Systems and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207